CO129-136 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [1-3] — Page 437

or any

do be also vested in the larown,

432

Crown, though

in 2:10

from

that

airi thonet Hole. Be for pallions & the Fine. Lavel Chelmsford in a recent case

Lord

Any person therefore erecting. wharf thercon

other Building the Liceuse of the brown is guilty of the offence called "Turprosture ; and even with the License

of the brown,

if

the

erection obstructs the mavigation, avithout

conforming some commensurate public

J. 12. Sisters of this the House of Lords dissents;

Po portibus lotus Ropsão) dachime. In

7.85

Glanville

(gout)

benefit he is by.

the

Commalt

law quilly

Spelman

of a

Auisance for avhich an inclictment Clefs Phrpresta

may be proporrect by cony subject of the

Realm, as the Crown cannot license

"Anisance", but whether the act compliant

of be a Arivance

fact for a Jury.

01 not is a question of

o the boot of the sece or

à fondas maris

below low avaler mark and for & miles from the shore, is said by all Text Writers,

any.

Caje

however, it is clear

in the

sece anul in the seashore

that this propiority of the Sovereign

bed of the between high and low mark is vested. in the Crown as Stuatec for the Public,

for securing to them the rights of free. to the authorities navigation and all the privileges

The

collerted in

from such

· properly.

may gr

which

thastights of though the brown rant to privats.

individuals the legal Title to the shore the Interest therein acquired by

Mater. fr. 14.850

latter is subordinaté de the

interests of the stublic ..

the

general

The distinction must be kept

DE